Tactical Analysis: Shakhtar Donetsk 0 Manchester City 3
Getty Images
SHARE
UEFA Champions League, Group F – October 23 2018
Shakhtar Donetsk 0Manchester City 3
David Silva (30)
Laporte (35)
Bernardo Silva (70)
Manchester City moved ahead of Lyon to take over top spot in Champions League Group F with a resounding away victory over Shakhtar Donetsk – the first time an English side has beaten the Ukrainian outfit on home soil in Europe. David Silva volleyed in the opening goal at the half-hour mark before Aymeric Laporte doubled their lead five minutes later from a corner. City reduced the intensity of their play in the second half, but they remained a threat and substitute Bernardo Silva wrapped up the three points with an excellent finish 20 minutes from time. The victory also featured a return to action for Kevin De Bruyne, who has made a recovery from a knee injury sustained in August. They'll be hoping their unbeaten run extends to eight games, as they next travel to Wembley in a potentially tricky fixture against Tottenham in the Premier League.
Starting line-ups
Shakhtar Donetsk
Manchester City
Match Stats
Shakhtar DonetskManchester City
14
/
3
SHOTS / ON TARGET
24
/
7
496/429
Passes / Accurate
557/476
5 / 1 / 0
Fouls / Yellow / Red
15 / 1 / 0
Analysis: Shakhtar Donetsk
Shakhtar Donetsk maintained their 4-2-3-1 formation for the visit of Manchester City, but head coach Paulo Fonseca opted to make five changes to his side. Mykola Matviyenko and Yaroslav Rakitskiy came into the back line, while Taras Stepanenko was introduced in defensive midfield. The two final changes saw Viktor Kovalenko and Fernando Pedro come into the attack.
Shakhtar saw very little of the ball against a dominant away side in the opening exchanges. In their first moment of possession, both central defenders expanded, allowing the double pivot of Stepanenko and Maycon to drop deeper in the central lane. This in turn enabled both full-backs to push higher, moving in line with Kovalenko in the central number 10 position. Despite this bold and expansive opening piece of play, their opponents’ high line and intense pressing ensured possession remained limited.
The hosts’ ventures into the final third only came from mistakes made by City throughout the first half. Shakhtar's best chance to regain possession came via passes back into the central lane from the wide areas, as their mid-block lacked any form of intensity with regards to consistent pressure on the ball. With Fernandinho dropping deeper as the game progressed, they were afforded more central space to drive forward after a regain, but their quality when attacking one-on-one was of a low standard.
They continued to expand when goalkeeper Andriy Pyatov possessed the ball, but despite initially distributing to a man in space, City’s ability to regain possession by winning individual duels created additional chances for the visitors. While desperate long balls forward were then often won by Junior Moraes at the first contact, the lone striker lacked supporting runners to gain control of the second ball.
After conceding in the 30th minute, Shakhtar eventually had a promising spell of possession in which the full-backs moved very high – well ahead of their defensive midfield pairing. Wingers Wellington Nem and Fernando also moved higher, forming an extremely narrow front three with Moraes. Now, they could receive through-balls in behind the visitors’ defence with runs made blindside of their full-back markers. This approach resulted in a few corners being won, but they were still struggling to threaten and soon went two goals down following poor marking from a corner conceded themselves.
Shakhtar’s play in the second half was much more promising. As City set up in a more reserved mid-block around the halfway line, the midfield could get on the ball more. With John Stones in an unnatural right-back role, the hosts naturally targeted this side to attack. Fernando continued with his inside movements, allowing left-back Ismaily to step forward, with and without the ball. Fernando’s runs inside were performed slightly later compared to the first half now that the front three had become less compact as their possession increased.
Long balls in behind for both full-backs to run on to proved a direct and effective method to penetrate into the final third. The hosts made use of Kovalenko’s positioning in between the lines to effectively switch the play to the opposite full-back or to combine centrally with Wellington and Fernando. But despite finding an inroad into their opponents’ half, Ederson stood firm to any effort on goal.
Shakhtar converted into a 4-4-2 structure when defending, with Kovalenko moving from his number 10 role into a second supporting striker. They then formed a compact mid-block, focused on reducing the central space between their midfield and defensive units. This, however, naturally afforded City spaces in the wide areas, and the visitors progressed well down the right side.
Kevin De Bruyne capitalised on this most, increasingly moving across to Shakhtar’s left side. As a result, the hosts’ back-line gradually shifted across to cover the threat. This sliding across from right to left wasn’t always well co-ordinated though, and central gaps started to appear. David Silva and Raheem Sterling eventually started to exploit these gaps through forward running, and City's lead at half-time was deserved.
Shakhtar’s 4-4-2 structure was reasonably organised throughout the match and they worked hard to protect various key spaces. But they were let down by a lack of skill under pressure and an inability to beat their man one-on-one. Once the visitors grabbed a third goal following a rapid counter-attack from deep, the game was well and truly over.
In pictures
In the rare moments of first-half possession for the hosts, they targeted the forward runs from full-backs Ismaily and Mykola Matviyenko as the front three narrowed.
Shakhtar set up in a 4-4-2 mid-block, as Manchester City dominated the opening 45 minutes of play.
The hosts continued to target their advancing full-backs in the second half, but sent more direct balls in behind. The front three also became more expansive, horizontally stretching City’s back line.
When in possession, John Stones, in a right-back position, frequently stepped inside, creating an earlier passing lane on the switch of play to hit Riyad Mahrez’s feet. Combinations with Kevin De Bruyne then helped City progress on their right side.
City’s 4-1-4-1 defensive structure was maintained throughout the match, as De Bruyne and David Silva pressed Shakhtar’s defensive midfielders.
The visitors continued in their 4-1-4-1 defensive structure, but spent a considerable amount of time compact within their own half, prioritising a transitional approach with the ball.
Analysis: Manchester City
Head coach Pep Guardiola maintained the 4-3-3 structure that had demolished Burnley in the Premier League, but four changes were made to his Manchester City team. Nicolas Otamendi came back into central defence, while Kevin De Bruyne returned from injury for his first appearance in the Champions League this season. Sergio Aguero and Leroy Sane dropped to the bench, with Raheem Sterling and Gabriel Jesus selected in attack.
City dominated the early possession and prioritised building their attacks using the width provided by Sterling and Riyad Mahrez – both wingers remained near the touchlines throughout to stretch Shakhtar’s back line. During the early parts of their build, either John Stones or Benjamin Mendy would step inside to join Fernandinho as a double pivot. Even if Fernandinho dropped back to form a central back three, the inside movements from the full-backs opened a quicker passing lane out to the wingers. The positioning of David Silva and De Bruyne created third-man combinations with the receiving winger, as the corresponding full-back then ran in behind to provide crosses.
David Silva dropped deeper into central midfield as the first half progressed, while Fernandinho took on a more consistent role in the back line. This movement increased the visitors’ central combinations, as David Silva orchestrated the majority of the play forward. With the Spaniard luring away Shakhtar's right-sided defensive midfielder, Sterling in particular had more space to attack his full-back one-on-one and provide Jesus with crosses from the left.
The visitors deservedly took the lead at the half-hour mark following a regain from their high-pressing midfield. The ball eventually fell for David Silva via a low cross from Mendy, and the Spaniard volleyed low under the Shakhtar goalkeeper. The hosts responded well to conceding, gaining some valuable control of possession, but City grabbed a demoralising second five minutes later. De Bruyne’s corner found Aymeric Laporte free inside the penalty area after Stones’ clever blocking had created just enough space for his defensive partner to head home.
City reverted into a much deeper block in the second half, which naturally reduced their time in possession. After a spell pressing high to regain the ball, they remained in a compact mid-block for the remainder of the contest, and now looked to attack on the transition. The introduction of Bernardo Silva added pace and skill on the ball, from which the visitors duly profited. After regaining deep within their own half, the Portugal international and Mahrez drove forward down their right side. Bernardo cut back inside before unleashing a low drive that bounced in off the inside of the post to all but confirm a valuable away win in Group F.
Although Shakhtar had easy access into their central number 10 Viktor Kovalenko during moments of transition, City’s quick-recovering midfield ensured that his link-up play with supporting runners often resulted in loss of possession. David Silva and De Bruyne might have been positioned very high as the two attacking central midfielders, but their recoveries back to the ball were exemplary, forcing the hosts to resort to hopeful long balls forward to isolated striker Junior Moraes.
City's ability to control the game largely stemmed from their ability to regain possession and an aggressiveness during individual duels. Winning the majority of battles within midfield not only halted Shakhtar's progression but also increased the number of attacks City could create – particularly from high-pressing actions.
In the rare moments they were forced to drop into a compact shape, City utilised a 4-1-4-1 structure, with David Silva or De Bruyne stepping out of midfield to aggressively press Shakhtar’s double pivot and help Jesus block central access. They successfully funnelled the ball into the wide areas, where the hosts lacked quality on the ball from the full-backs especially.
City's high pressing continued in the opening spell of the second half, as their opponents failed to alter their now predictable build-up. Shakhtar didn’t alter their patterns of play in the slightest, making it easier for City to consistently press to good effect. They naturally reduced the intensity of this in the second half, with it seeming as though Guardiola used the opportunity to test out a more patient and compact defensive style without the ball. As a result, Shakhtar had their best spell in the game, but still failed to really test Ederson.
Our website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. This helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site.
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we store on your browser or the hard drive of your computer if you agree. Cookies contain information that is transferred to your computer's hard drive.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Performance cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Additional Cookies
This website uses the following additional cookies:
Cookie
Purpose
More information
join-mailing-list
WordPress sets this cookie when you load any page, We will hide newsletter form after click on close button and it will not show again on any page.
Cookie Value: 1
Expiry time: 1 week
gated-list_
WordPress sets this cookie when you load an article page, We will hide contact form after you click on the close button and it will not show again on the particular article page.
Cookie Value: dynamic cookie value generated here
Expiry time: 1 week
wordpress_test_cookie
WordPress sets this cookie when you navigate to the login page. The cookie is used to check whether your web browser is set to allow, or reject cookies.
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wp-settings-time-1
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wordpress_logged_in_xxxxx
WordPress uses this cookie to indicate when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use.
Cookie Value: Your login details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
wordpress_xxxxx
WordPress uses these cookies to store your authentication details, and their use is limited to the admin console area.
Cookie Value: Your login authentication details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
Please note that third parties (including, for example, advertising networks and providers of external services like web traffic analysis services) may also use cookies, over which we have no control. These cookies are likely to be analytical/performance cookies or targeting cookies.
You can block cookies by activating the setting on your browser that allows you to refuse the setting of all or some cookies. However, if you use your browser settings to block all cookies (including essential cookies) you may not be able to access all or parts of our site.
Except for essential cookies, all cookies will expire after the expiry periods stated in the table above.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!