Manchester City served early notice of their status as genuine title contenders with this impressive victory over Antonio Conte's champions at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea were already second best when in-form forward Alvaro Morata was withdrawn before half-time, but with Eden Hazard still short of match-fitness they struggled to make any dents in the visitors' resolute defence. City dominated possession and showed great patience before man-of-the-match Kevin De Bruyne found a rare bit of space between the Chelsea lines and thrashed home the game's only goal midway through the second half.
Starting line-ups
Chelsea
Manchester City
Match Stats
ChelseaManchester City
4
/
2
SHOTS / ON TARGET
15
/
5
447/362
Passes / Accurate
678/614
8 / 0 / 0
Fouls / Yellow / Red
13 / 2 / 0
Analysis: Chelsea
Antonio Conte’s side started in a 5-3-2 formation, at times switching to 5-4-1 in defence, with Cesar Azpilicueta and Marcos Alonso in the wing-back positions and Eden Hazard pushed up to join Alvaro Morata in attack. A first-half injury to Morata saw him replaced by Willian, with Michy Batshuayi later brought on as a lone forward to be supported by Willian and fellow substitute Pedro out wide.
The aim of Chelsea’s first line of defence was to force the Manchester City back four into a direct approach, as they knew that playing out from the back was fundamental to their game. This didn’t work particularly well, as Ederson in the City goal always managed to find an option, meaning that Chelsea had to put considerable pressure on the ball in midfield. N’Golo Kante, Cesc Fabregas and Tiemoue Bakayoko worked hard to anticipate play in their own half, with the result that the team fell back into two compact lines in their 5-4-1 shape, and moved quickly to get numbers back behind the ball in defensive transition.
The home side’s preferred option in attack was combination play, but they found many difficulties in playing out from the back and struggled to get their most dangerous players into advantageous positions. The strong pressure applied by Manchester City across the pitch forced Conte’s side to play direct into Morata or wide to Marcos Alonso, the more offensively minded wing-back – but in reality they found it difficult to create goalscoring opportunities and the injury to Morata gave them even less of an attacking presence. Hazard, himself not long back from injury and looking short of match-fitness, was well short of his best.
On the counter-attack, too, Chelsea failed to transition quickly enough to create or take advantage of any possible imbalances in the City defensive line. They had few opportunities to develop in this part of the game, however – the visitors’ dominance of possession meant they rarely lost the ball.
In pictures
Chelsea started in a 5-3-2 formation, with Cesar Azpilicueta and Marcos Alonso starting as the wing-backs outside the back three and Eden Hazard positioned up top alongside Alvaro Morata.
Chelsea looked to put considerable pressure on the ball in midfield. Antonio Conte’s midfield three of Tiemoue Bakayoko, N’Golo Kante and, here, Cesc Fabregas worked hard to close down the Manchester City playmakers.
The first line of Blues pressure struggled to win the ball back or have much impact in their defensive transition. Beyond them, the home team looked to get men back in numbers to neutralise the threat of City on the counter-attack.
Chelsea retained the same defensive shape in the second half, when Pedro and Michy Batshuayi replaced Hazard and Bakayoko. Willian had already replaced the injured Alvaro Morata in the first half.
The home side attempted to play through midfield areas, but the wing-backs – in particular Marcos Alonso, as seen here – also provided potential outlets for their midfielders. They were encouraged to push further forward once City went a goal ahead.
Manchester City started in a 4-3-3, switching to 4-1-4-1 or 4-4-2 in defence depending on the situation. They always looked to go straight into a high press, starting with Gabriel Jesus and one of either Kevin De Bruyne or David Silva, as here, joining him to put pressure on the first line of Chelsea possession.
The intention of the City front line was to force the Chelsea back line to play direct. Here, wide men Leroy Sane and Raheem Sterling press high alongside Jesus to force Thibaut Courtois into playing it long.
City looked to build from the back, with goalkeeper Ederson combining mostly with his centre-backs John Stones and Nicolas Otamendi. Even when Chelsea obstructed these avenues, City found ways of progressing easily – as here, where Ederson finds Fernandinho in plenty of space.
In possession, City were able to create an extra man in midfield by bringing in one of the full-backs. Here, Fabian Delph moves inside from his left-back position to give Fernandinho an extra option and generate uncertainty in the Chelsea midfield.
Despite starting in central midfield, De Bruyne constantly looked to get in behind the Chelsea line of pressure. The build-up to the goal is a perfect example of this, as he drifts in between the lines and is found by Otamendi before hammering home a superb winner.
Analysis: Manchester City
Pep Guardiola started his Manchester City team in a 4-3-3 formation, switching to 4-1-4-1 or 4-4-2 in defence depending on the situation. They always went straight into a high press, starting with Gabriel Jesus and one of either Kevin De Bruyne or David Silva joining him from midfield. The intention of the City front line was to force the first line of Chelsea possession to go direct. Guardiola’s side showed a constant willingness to harry the player in possession and to intercept in midfield. As a result, their defensive line was barely threatened in the vicinity of their goal.
In the defensive transition, the Citizens tried to win the ball back immediately after losing it, and prevent passes into the space from where the ball was lost. So rarely did they lose possession, however, that they were scarcely troubled in this area of the game.
In attack, the visitors looked to build from the back, with goalkeeper Ederson always looking for John Stones or Nicolas Otamendi in front of him. Guardiola wants his side to dominate play through all the thirds, and although Chelsea tried to block their routes forward they largely failed – even when his centre-backs were covered, Ederson was able to find Fernandinho or De Bruyne. City also looked to push their full-backs into central areas to create the extra man in midfield when in possession. They particularly used left-back Fabian Delph – a midfielder by trade – in this way, to create uncertainty and imbalance in the Chelsea midfield.
Despite their dominance in possession, however, City did find it difficult to find their forward Gabriel Jesus in dangerous positions against a compact Chelsea back five. Instead, they looked wide to Leroy Sane and Raheem Sterling, or as the game went on to the clever movement of Silva or De Bruyne in between the lines. It was the latter who found space on 67 minutes, to take receipt of a ball from Otamendi and thrash home from distance.
Having gone a goal up, several counter-attacking opportunities presented themselves. Sterling, Gabriel Jesus or Sane were always looking to exploit the possible imbalances in the defensive structure of their rivals, looking for spaces in between and in behind the last men in defence.
Key points
The early injury to Alvaro Morata hurt Chelsea’s threat in attack. The forward was in a rich vein of form, having scored six goals in his past six games.
Both sides were already missing key players. Chelsea were without the suspended David Luiz and the injured Danny Drinkwater, while City were missing Vincent Kompany, Benjamin Mendy and Sergio Aguero.
In the final third, Chelsea found it difficult to find pathways through the last line of the City defence. The injury to Morata gave them even less attacking presence, while Eden Hazard, not long returned from injury himself, looked short of his best.
Manchester City’s determination to play through the thirds saw them look to use the full-backs to create numerical superiority in central areas. Left-back Fabian Delph was particularly useful in this regard, as this is his more natural position.
City showed great patience in dominating possession for long periods, waiting for the chances on goal they were confident would come. Such was their superiority, that Kevin De Bruyne’s sole strike was enough for the win.
Our website uses cookies to distinguish you from other users of our website. This helps us to provide you with a good experience when you browse our website and also allows us to improve our site.
A cookie is a small file of letters and numbers that we store on your browser or the hard drive of your computer if you agree. Cookies contain information that is transferred to your computer's hard drive.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These are cookies that are required for the operation of our website. They include, for example, cookies that enable you to log into secure areas of our website.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Performance cookies
These allow us to recognise and count the number of visitors and to see how visitors move around our website when they are using it. This helps us to improve the way our website works, for example, by ensuring that users are finding what they are looking for easily.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Additional Cookies
This website uses the following additional cookies:
Cookie
Purpose
More information
join-mailing-list
WordPress sets this cookie when you load any page, We will hide newsletter form after click on close button and it will not show again on any page.
Cookie Value: 1
Expiry time: 1 week
gated-list_
WordPress sets this cookie when you load an article page, We will hide contact form after you click on the close button and it will not show again on the particular article page.
Cookie Value: dynamic cookie value generated here
Expiry time: 1 week
wordpress_test_cookie
WordPress sets this cookie when you navigate to the login page. The cookie is used to check whether your web browser is set to allow, or reject cookies.
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wp-settings-time-1
WordPress also sets a few wp-settings-[UID] cookies. The number on the end is your individual user ID from the users database table. This is used to customise your view of admin interface and in some circumstances the main site interface.
Cookie Value: Text indicating your preferred settings
Expiry time: session
wordpress_logged_in_xxxxx
WordPress uses this cookie to indicate when you’re logged in, and who you are, for most interface use.
Cookie Value: Your login details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
wordpress_xxxxx
WordPress uses these cookies to store your authentication details, and their use is limited to the admin console area.
Cookie Value: Your login authentication details in an encrypted form
Expiry time: session
Please note that third parties (including, for example, advertising networks and providers of external services like web traffic analysis services) may also use cookies, over which we have no control. These cookies are likely to be analytical/performance cookies or targeting cookies.
You can block cookies by activating the setting on your browser that allows you to refuse the setting of all or some cookies. However, if you use your browser settings to block all cookies (including essential cookies) you may not be able to access all or parts of our site.
Except for essential cookies, all cookies will expire after the expiry periods stated in the table above.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!